The Full Wiki

United States Court of Claims: Wikis

Advertisements
  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Court of Claims was a federal court that heard claims against the United States government. It was established in 1855 as the Court of Claims, renamed in 1948 to the United States Court of Claims (67 Stat. 226), and abolished in 1982.

Before the Court of Claims was established, monetary claims against the federal government were normally submitted through petitions to Congress. By the time of the Court's creation, this workload had become unwieldy, so Congress gave the Court jurisdiction to hear all monetary claims based upon a law, a regulation, or a federal government contract. The Court was required to report its findings to Congress and to prepare bills for payments to claimants whose petitions were approved by the Court; since only Congress was constitutionally empowered to make appropriations, Congress still had to approve these bills and reports, but this was normally pro forma.

The Court originally had three judges, who were given lifetime appointments. The judges were authorized to appoint commissioners to take depositions and issue subpoenas. The federal government was represented in the Court by a solicitor appointed by the President.

Contents

History

Advertisements

Establishment of the Court

The Court of Claims was established in 1855 to adjudicate certain claims brought against the United States government by veterans of the Mexican–American War.

In 1861, Abraham Lincoln in his Annual Message to Congress asked that the court be given the power to issue final judgments. Congress granted this power with the Act of March 3, 1863 [1], and explicitly made the judgments appealable to the Supreme Court. However, it also modified the law governing the Court so that its reports and bills were sent to the Department of the Treasury rather than directly to Congress. The moneys to cover these costs were then made a part of the appropriation for the Treasury Department.

The conflict inherent between these two provisions was made manifest when in 1864, the decision in Gordon v. United States was appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court denied that it had jurisdiction, because the decisions of the Court of Claims, hence any appeals, were subject to review by an executive department (69 U.S. 561; see also 117 U.S. 697). Less than a year later, Congress passed a law removing review of the Court of Claims from the Treasury Department.[2]

Passage of the Tucker Act

In 1887, Congress passed the Tucker Act (24 Stat. 505), which further restricted the claims that could be submitted directly to Congress, requiring that these claims instead be submitted to the Court of Claims. It broadened the court's jurisdiction so that “claims founded upon the Constitution” could be heard. In particular, this meant that monetary claims based on takings under the eminent domain clause of the Fifth Amendment could be brought before the Court of Claims. The Tucker Act also opened the Court to tax refund suits.

Depredations against American shipping committed by the French during the Quasi-War of 1793 to 1800 led to claims against France that were relinquished by the terms of the Treaty of 1800. Since the claims against France were no longer valid, claimants continually petitioned Congress for the relief that had been waived by the treaty. It wasn’t until January 20, 1885 that a law was passed, 23 Stat. 283, that provided for consideration of the matter before the Court of Claims. The lead case, Gray v. United States, 21 Ct. Cl. 340, written by Judge John Davis, includes a complete discussion of the historical and political circumstances which led to the hostilities between the United States and France and their resolution by treaty. The cases, termed "French Spoliation Claims", continued in the court until 1915.

In 1925, Congress changed the structure of the Court of Claims by authorizing the Court to appoint seven commissioners who were empowered to hear evidence in judicial proceedings and report on findings of fact. The judges of the Court of Claims would then serve as a board of review for the commissioners.

In 1932, Congress reduced the salary of the judges of the Court of Claims as part of the Legislative Appropriation Act of 1932. Thomas Sutler Williams was one of the judges of the Court, and he sued the federal government, claiming that his salary could not be cut because the Constitution specified that judicial salaries could not be reduced. The Supreme Court ruled on Williams v. United States in 1933, deciding that the Court of Claims was an Article I or legislative court, and that therefore Congress had the authority to reduce the salaries of the judges of the Court of Claims (289 U.S. 553).

Beginning in 1948, Congress directed that when directed by the court, the commissioner could make recommendations for conclusions of law (62 Stat. 976). Chief Judge Wilson Cowen made this mandatory under the court rules in 1964.

Elevation to Article III status

In 1953, Congress passed a law which converted the Court of Claims into an Article III court. That act also raised the number of commissioners to 15. [3]

Two more judges were added to the court in 1966, bringing the total to seven. [4]

Congress terminated the Indian Claims Commission in 1978 and required that any pending cases be transferred to the Court of Claims. Of the 170 cases so transferred many were complicated longstanding accounting claims that had been before the Commission for years. One of the most famous of these cases was United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, which ultimately reached the Supreme Court (448 U.S. 371). Aside from its large judgment awarded to the Sioux, the case also featured interesting questions about judicial power and the ability of Congress to waive the Federal government's legal defense of res judicata to allow a claim to be judicially determined. [5]

Abolition

In 1982, Congress abolished the court, transferring its trial level jurisdiction to the newly created United States Claims Court (which is now known as the United States Court of Federal Claims) and its appellate jurisdiction to the equally new United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. By this time, the Court had expanded to have seven judges; they were transferred to the Federal Circuit.

Judges

Following is a list of judges who have served on the United States Court of Claims up to the merger of the Court into the Federal Circuit.

Judge Began active
service
Ended active
service
Blackford, Isaac NewtonIsaac Newton Blackford 1855 1859
Gilchrist, John JamesJohn James Gilchrist 1855 1858
Scarburgh, George ParkerGeorge Parker Scarburgh 1855 1861
Loring, Edward G.Edward G. Loring 1858 1877
Hughes, JamesJames Hughes 1860 1864
Casey, JosephJoseph Casey 1861 1870
Peck, EbenezerEbenezer Peck 1863 1878
Wilmot, DavidDavid Wilmot 1863 1868
Nott, Charles CooperCharles Cooper Nott 1865 1916
Milligan, SamuelSamuel Milligan 1868 1874
Drake, Charles DanielCharles Daniel Drake 1870 1885
Richardson, William AdamsWilliam Adams Richardson 1874 1896
Davis, John Chandler BancroftJohn Chandler Bancroft Davis 1877 1883
Hunt, William H.William H. Hunt 1878 1881
Scofield, Glenni WilliamGlenni William Scofield 1881 1891
Weldon, LawrenceLawrence Weldon 1883 1905
Davis, JohnJohn Davis 1885 1902
Peelle, Stanton JudkinsStanton Judkins Peelle 1892 1913
Howry, Charles BowenCharles Bowen Howry 1897 1928
Atkinson, George WesleyGeorge Wesley Atkinson 1905 1916
Barney, Samuel StebbinsSamuel Stebbins Barney 1905 1919
Booth, Fenton WhitlockFenton Whitlock Booth 1905 1947
Campbell, Edward KernanEdward Kernan Campbell 1913 1938
Downey , George EddyGeorge Eddy Downey 1915 1926
Hay, JamesJames Hay 1916 1931
Graham, Samuel JordanSamuel Jordan Graham 1919 1951
Moss, John McKenzieJohn McKenzie Moss 1926 1929
Green, William RaymondWilliam Raymond Green 1928 1947
Sinnott, Nicholas JohnNicholas John Sinnott 1928 1929
Littleton, Benjamin HorsleyBenjamin Horsley Littleton 1929 1966
Williams, Thomas SutlerThomas Sutler Williams 1929 1940
Whaley, Richard SmithRichard Smith Whaley 1930 1951
Whitaker, Samuel EstillSamuel Estill Whitaker 1939 1967
Jones, John MarvinJohn Marvin Jones 1940 1947
Madden, Joseph WarrenJoseph Warren Madden 1941 1972
Howell, George EvanGeorge Evan Howell 1947 1953
Laramore, Don NelsonDon Nelson Laramore 1954 1982
Durfee, James RandallJames Randall Durfee 1960 1977
Davis, Oscar HirshOscar Hirsh Davis 1962 1982
Collins, Linton McGeeLinton McGee Collins 1964 1972
Cowen, Arnold WilsonArnold Wilson Cowen 1964 1982
Nichols Jr., PhilipPhilip Nichols Jr. 1966 1982
Skelton, Byron GeorgeByron George Skelton 1966 1982
Kunzig, Robert LoweRobert Lowe Kunzig 1971 1982
Bennett, Marion TinsleyMarion Tinsley Bennett 1972 1982
Kashiwa, ShiroShiro Kashiwa 1972 1982
Friedman, Daniel MortimerDaniel Mortimer Friedman 1978 1982
Smith, Edward SamuelEdward Samuel Smith 1978 1982

See also

Notes

  1. ^ 12 Stat. 765
  2. ^ 14 Stat. 9
  3. ^ Pub.L. 83-158, 67 Stat. 226
  4. ^ Pub.L. 89-425, 80 Stat. 139
  5. ^ Lazarus, Edward (1991). Black Hills, White Justice. New York: HarperCollins. ISBN 006016557X.  

References

Books
Journals
Websites

Advertisements






Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message