The Full Wiki

Vidding: Wikis


Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vidding is the fan labor practice in media fandom of creating music videos from the footage of one or more visual media sources, thereby commenting on the source text(s). The creator may explore a single character, support a particular romantic pairing between characters, criticize or celebrate the original text, or point out an aspect of the TV show or film that she feels goes unnoticed. The creators refer to themselves as "vidders", their product as "vids", "fanvids", or "songvids", and the act itself as vidding.

Vidding can occur within a fandom; however, it is also often considered its own fandom, as vidding fans will often watch vids simply because they are vids. (This is distinct from fan fiction readers and other fans, for instance, who tend to choose what to engage based on source text more than form.) Accordingly, vidding has its own dedicated fan convention, Vividcon.

Fan video culture and products within anime fandom are distinct from those of media fandom. Rather than fanvids, anime fans produce anime music videos. Interestingly, while a large number of anime video makers are male,[citation needed] the bulk of vidders in media fandom are women.[1][2][3]



Vidding began in 1975,[1] when Kandy Fong synced Star Trek stills on a slide projector with music from a cassette player.[4] She performed her vids with live cutting at fan conventions, which continue to be one of the main venues for vid-watching.[2] When home videocassette tape recorders became available in the mid-1970s, vidders began producing live-action vids that were recorded onto media that could be shown at fan conventions and further distributed to fans.[3] Substantial technical and artistic skill were required to cut vids together, often requiring footage from multiple VCRs to be placed on the same tape, with the added challenge of exact timing. Typical vids could take 6–8 hours to produce, and more elaborate ones could take substantially longer.[5] Vidders, predominately women, passed this knowledge on to each other.[2]

With the rise of digital media, greater bandwidth, and the widespread availability of free, albeit basic, video creating/editing software such as iMovie and Windows Movie Maker, the skill level required for vidding has been reduced and the number of distribution outlets has increased. As a result, both the number of vidders and the number of accessible vids has skyrocketed.[2] However, because of concerns that the outside community won't understand the vids and the context of vidding as well as some copyright and intellectual property concerns,[6] many of the most experienced vidders do not make their vids readily-accessible on public venues such as YouTube[6], although this is changing.[2]

Schools of Vidding

There are three main schools of vidding:[2][5]

  • MediaWest vidders congregated around the MediaWest*Con fan convention, which began in the 1970s and provided a vid room. Vids were shown repeatedly, and people wandered in and out all day. MediaWest-type vids are meant to be understood by people who don't bring a lot of context to them (including even knowledge of the fandom source text), so are often spectacular, splashy, or funny.
  • Living room vidders, the followers of Mary Van Deusen, are designed to be watched by fans multiple times in a quiet environment. These vids call for viewers to have intimate familiarity with the source and to study the vid's visual choices through multiple watchings, so that the vidder's arguments can be understood. Fully understanding a living room vid is most akin to poetry analysis; it usually calls for understanding the source text, learning the song lyrics, watching for visual metaphors and alterations to the original scenes, as well as being involved in the community.
  • San Francisco vidders tell stories similarly to Mary Van Deusen and her followers, but with an art school sensibility. This school of vidding emerged in the late 1990s and early 2000s, and is defined by more concern for the visual and different use of color and motion than classic vidding.

In the age of YouTube and other video sites on the internet, there is increasing cross-pollination between these schools, as well as between vids, anime music videos, machinima, and political remix music videos.[1][2][6]


Vidding uses all the terminology common to media fandom, as well as terminology developed for vidding-specific needs. For instance, "MM" may stand for multimedia, meaning a vid made from more than one source show. A "garbage can vid" is a multimedia vid with source from tens or even hundreds of shows and movies. In "Munk-itized" songvids, the creator takes a song and raises the pitch on it, making it sound like the characters in Alvin and the Chipmunks.[citation needed]


Fanvids are created based on material from TV shows, movies, and occasionally official music videos to make an argument through juxtaposing the original video with song lyrics. In vids, the music is an analytic device rather than a soundtrack.[2] At their best, fanvids are a cross between narrative story-telling and visual poetry, a form of visual essay that uses the source material itself to put forward one aspect of how the author sees the source. At their worst, vids are little more than a string of shots strung together, akin to a thesis statement without significant backup.

Many fanvids are primarily concerned with shipping, the love stories that a fan sees within her favorite films or TV shows. Existing romantic scenes may be further romanticized through video transformations or song choice. The author may also argue for a romantic pairing that does not occur in the source text through juxtaposing relevant scenes or even splicing in additional material. Supporters or "shippers" of on-screen couples may also manipulate clips to retroactively change scenes to fit a within-vid reality that incorporates their pairing.[6]

Copyright and Fair Use

As television and online media increasingly intermingle in the age of new media and digitization, a prosumer can create their own work out of copyrighted material.[7]

Copyright law attributes the clips and the music in fanvids as the property of those who originally produced them for radio and television/film. As a result, some fans and lawyers worry and argue that fanvids constitute a breach of copyright law. Other fans and lawyers, such as those in the Organization for Transformative Works, argue that fanvids fall under the fair use exception to copyright laws, as only small snippets of video images are used creatively and no profit is made.[8]

Websites such as YouTube caution against the uploading of copyrighted material, even though thousands of fanvids have been uploaded there. Fans with material on that website will sometimes find their vids removed with a copyright infringement message, despite having spent time and effort perfecting their fan creations.[1][2]

See also


  1. ^ a b c d Ulaby, Neda (25 February 2009). "Vidders Talk Back To Their Pop-Culture Muses". NPR: All Things Considered. Retrieved 15 August 2009. 
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i Walker, Jesse (August/September 2008). "Remixing Television: Francesca Coppa on the vidding underground". Reason Online. Retrieved 15 August 2009. 
  3. ^ a b Hill, Logan (12 November 2007). "The Vidder". New York Magazine. Retrieved 15 August 2009. 
  4. ^ Coppa, Francesca (19 November 2007). "Celebrating Kandy Fong: Founder of Fannish Music Video". In Media Res: A Media Commons Project. Retrieved 12 August 2009. 
  5. ^ a b Jenkins, Henry (1992). Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. Studies in Culture and Communication. Routledge. ISBN 0415905729. 
  6. ^ a b c d Jenkins, Henry (18 September 2006). "How to Watch a Fan-Vid". Confessions of an Aca-Fan: The Official Webblog of Henry Jenkins. Retrieved 15 August 2009. 
  7. ^ Croteau, D. & Hoynes, W. (2003) Media Society: Industries, Images and Audiences (third edition) Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks
  8. ^ "Test Suite of Fair Use Vids". Organization for Transformative Works. Retrieved 3 September 2009. 

Further reading

Vidding history



External links

Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address