The Full Wiki

More info on WT:VIP

WT:VIP: Wikis

Advertisements

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Travel guide

Up to date as of January 14, 2010
(Redirected to Wikitravel:Vandalism in progress article)

From Wikitravel

Please read Wikitravel:How to handle unwanted edits to understand what is vandalism to Wikitravel.

Please report vandalism at the top of the "Current alerts" list below. Please only use this page for repeated malicious vandalism, not for one-off edits, or newbie tests (which you can simply revert by yourself). Except in cases of vandalbot or other rapid-fire attacks, please warn users and wait for further vandalism before listing them here. Do not list non-vandalism. Please list the IP address or user name (use the format [[Special:Contributions/Username|Username]] or [[Special:Contributions/IP Address|IP Address]] as the header), pages touched and damage done. Sign your name using ~~~~ after your report. Put the person's IP or username in the edit summary.

See also Wikitravel:User ban nominations, Wikitravel:Vandalism/Archive/2004-2006, Wikitravel:Vandalism/Archive/2007, Wikitravel:Vandalism/Archive/2008.

Current alerts

Advertisements

94.101.164.1

Repeated vandalism in progress on the already patchy Basildon page. Thanks also to Nrms for reverting some, but more help is appreciated as the existing material is hardly useful. Will help to clean it up, but local knowledge need. Thanks y'all. Jamesbrownontheroad 05:42, 30 January 2009 (EST)

  • Move vandal --Rein N. 03:20, 27 June 2009 (EDT)

Possible new attack

I see another attack brewing out on the horizon, the usual pattern of the vandal's randomly generated user names, have seen a lot of new users created in the past days - should we take pre-emptive action, and block them as they are created, or is the price of risking to block innocent users to much?

AcbasLetoe, GetvaRricc, BotrrIcaco, ChigeTleto, BaslaGetvi, ZelgeTrice, Roc4tRolsi, Domc4Tmono, Acc4tDarze, DronlEtoal, ZelacElero, AllitRdelc, TrricBasbo, BaserRicmo, LetorIccna, NobocElrel,

--Stefan (sertmann) Talk 03:28, 17 August 2009 (EDT)

Those are spammers with 99.99% probability. Block at will, I say. Jpatokal 06:15, 17 August 2009 (EDT)
I'm with Jani. Having had trouble with ten-letter autospambots on other wikis, pre-emption is the only way to go with them. -- Bill-on-the-Hill 09:54, 17 August 2009 (EDT)
Agreed. They've been popping up across language versions starting yesterday. --Peter Talk 16:10, 17 August 2009 (EDT)

Wiktionary

Up to date as of January 15, 2010
(Redirected to Wiktionary:Vandalism in progress article)

Definition from Wiktionary, a free dictionary

Shortcut:
WT:VIP
This page is intended to get administrator attention quickly when dealing with current instances of vandalism. List new alerts at the top of the list in the following manner:

* {{vandal|username or IP}} Brief reason why, preferably a link to a vandalized page. ~~~~

Don’t include the User: prefix in the template!

Please do not add cases older than two to three hours. Denied requests will have an explanation added here, and be kept for one to seven days before being removed. Thank you for helping us keep an organized Wiktionary!

Admins: Please remove performed blocks.

Subpage:

  • Wiktionary:Point of view pushing

New alerts

Geek (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • page moves • block user • block logactive blocks) edits pages with nonsense phrases. Jamesjiao 08:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC) Wikievil666 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • page moves • block user • block logactive blocks) edits archive page[1] --Dan Polansky 23:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Yeah I spotted that earlier. They're not bad edits, and the timestamps are correct, but they are archives. Maybe just a note on the talk page, I'd strongly oppose a block. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:20, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

196.211.48.97 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • page moves • block user • block logactive blocks)

POV and badly formatted editing. Doesn't seem to be deliberate vandalism, but if I revert someone then has to clean up the article as it was before. See licence. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

达伟 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • page moves • block user • block logactive blocks). Not a vandal but needs to be taught formatting and their edits need reviewing L☺g☺maniac ☃ 16:44, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

65.92.120.68 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • page moves • block user • block logactive blocks) on patsy. Cdhaptomos 23:18, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

92.12.39.6 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • page moves • block user • block logactive blocks), (accidentally?) creating pages. Cdhaptomos 23:20, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

122.162.158.101 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • page moves • block user • block logactive blocks), created aurally challenged. I'd oppose a block, but maybe a message on syntax etc.. Cdhaptomos 12:44, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Darrit12 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • page moves • block user • block logactive blocks). Vandal account. WikiPedant 05:36, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

24.14.120.59 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • page moves • block user • block logactive blocks), created volmer, Augustyn, and vandalized Wood. --Afc0703 06:36, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


Advertisements






Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message