Work for hire: Wikis


Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A work made for hire (sometimes abbreviated as work for hire and WFH) is an exception to the general rule that the person who actually creates a work is the legally-recognized author of that work. According to copyright law in the United States and certain other copyright jurisdictions, if a work is "made for hire", the employer—not the employee—is considered the legal author. In some countries, this is known as corporate authorship. The incorporated entity serving as an employer may be a corporation or other legal entity, an organization, or an individual.

States that are party to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works recognize separately copyrights and moral rights. Moral rights include the right of the actual creators to publicly identify themselves as such, and to maintain the integrity of their work.

The actual creator may or may not be publicly credited for the work, and this credit does not affect its legal status. For example, Microsoft hired many programmers to develop the Windows operating system, which is credited simply to Microsoft Corporation. By contrast, Adobe Systems lists many of the developers of Photoshop in its credits. In both cases, the software is the property of the employing company. In both cases, the actual creators have moral rights. Similarly, newspapers routinely credit news articles written by their staff, and publishers credit the writers and illustrators who produce comics featuring characters such as Batman or Spider-Man, but the publishers hold copyrights to the work. In the case of articles published in academic journals, it is common for the publisher to require the authors to sign a copyright transfer, a short legal document transferring all author copyrights to the publisher. The authors retain moral rights in their work, and may also be granted by the publisher a license to distribute the article themselves (e.g., in the form of reprints and PDFs) or create derivative works from it (eg, to use illustrations from the article in future publications or presentations).


Law of the United States

The U.S. Constitution requires the initial owner of a copyright in a work be the author.[1] In most cases, the author is the individual or group of individuals that actually creates the work. However, when a work is created by an employee as part of her job, or when certain kinds of works are created on behalf of a client and all parties agree in writing to the designation, a work may be a "work for hire." The author of a work for hire is never the actual creator. Instead, the author is the person or entity that hired the creator.[2] The above U.S. Constitutional requirement is why the employer or paying client is considered the "author" in a work for hire, contrary to standard usage of the word "author", because a law directing copyright be awarded to an employer or client instead of the author would be unconstitutional.

The circumstances in which a work is considered a "work made for hire"—or "work for hire," or sometimes abbreviated "WFH"—is determined by the language of the United States Copyright Act of 1976:

A "work made for hire" is— (1) a work prepared by an employee within the scope of his or her employment; or (2) a work specially ordered or commissioned for use as a contribution to a collective work, as a part of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, as a translation, as a supplementary work, as a compilation, as an instructional text, as a test, as answer material for a test, or as an atlas, if the parties expressly agree in a written instrument signed by them that the work shall be considered a work made for hire. (17 U.S.C. § 101)

The first situation applies only when the work's creator is an employee, not merely an independent contractor.[3] The determination of whether an individual is an employee for the purposes of the work made for hire doctrine is determined under the common law of agency[3], in which a court looks to a multitude of factors to determine whether an employer-employee relationship exists. In the Supreme Court case affirming that the common law of agency should be used to distinguish employers from independent contractors in the work for hire context, CCNV v. Reid[4], the Court listed some of these factors:

In determining whether a hired party is an employee under the general common law of agency, we consider the hiring party's right to control the manner and means by which the product is accomplished. Among the other factors relevant to this inquiry are the skill required; the source of the instrumentalities and tools; the location of the work; the duration of the relationship between the parties; whether the hiring party has the right to assign additional projects to the hired party; the extent of the hired party's discretion over when and how long to work; the method of payment; the hired party's role in hiring and paying assistants; whether the hiring party is in business; the provision of employee benefits; and the tax treatment of the hired party. See Restatement § 220(2) (setting forth a non-exhaustive list of factors relevant to determining whether a hired party is an employee)."

Examples of works made for hire in an employer-employee context are a software program created by an employee programmer or ad copy created by a marketing department employee.[5]

On the other hand, if the work is created by an independent contractor or freelancer, the work may be considered a work for hire only if all of the following conditions are met:

  • the work must come within one of the nine limited categories of works listed in the definition above, namely (1) a contribution to a collective work, (2) a part of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, (3) a translation, (4) a supplementary work, (5) a compilation, (6) an instructional text, (7) a test, (8) answer material for a test, (9) an atlas;
  • the work must be specially ordered or commissioned;
  • there must be a written agreement between the parties specifying that the work is a work made for hire.[3]

In other words, mutual agreement that a work is a work for hire is not enough. For example, if a musician were commissioned by Jimmy Wales to write a symphony in honor of Wikipedia's 10th Anniversary, and the musician readily agreed—confirmed in writing—that the work was a work for hire, promised in writing to never consider the symphony anything but a work for hire, it would not be a work for hire. In the absence of any other written agreement about transferring copyright to the hired party, Mr. Wales would have only an implied-in-conduct nonexclusive license. The musician would remain free to sell or license the symphony to others, including Mr. Wales if he so desired. However, unlike a work for hire, if the musician sold the symphony copyright he would have an inalienable right to terminate the copyright transfer 35 years after agreeing to permanently relinquish the symphony's copyright. These restrictions, in both the work for hire doctrine and the right of termination, exist out of recognition that artists frequently face unequal bargaining power in their business dealings.

When forced to rely on an implied license, a hiring party often finds that it has only limited rights to alter, update, or transform the work for which it paid. For example, a motion picture feature may hire dozens of creators of copyrightable works (e.g. music scores, scripts, sets, sound effects), any one of which could limit use of the entire film by denying permission to copy their contribution; the producers avoid this scenario by requiring that all contributions by non-employees fulfill the work-for-hire requirements.

Even when a work is not a work made for hire, the parties can agree to assign copyright rights from the author to the party paying for the creation of the work. However, the assignment is effectively limited to only 35 years, compared with 120 years for a work for hire, because if the copyright has any value 35 years later the author or her heirs will exercise her right to terminate the assignment, following which the hiring party will have to buy it back again if it wishes to continue using it.

The application of the law to materials such as lectures, textbooks, and academic articles produced by teachers is somewhat unclear. The near-universal practice in education has traditionally been to act on the assumption that they were not work for hire.[6]

Law of Ireland

Under Irish law, the first copyright holder of a work made by an employee in the course of an employment is the employer. To the contrary, copyright in works made for hire outside an employer/employee relationship remains with the author.[7]

Copyright duration

In the United States a "work for hire" (published after 1978) receives copyright protection until 120 years after creation or 95 years after publication, whichever comes first. This differs from the standard U.S. copyright term of life of the author plus 70 years because the "author" of a work for hire is often not an actual person, in which case the standard term would be unlimited, which is unconstitutional.[8]

In the European Union, even if a Member State provides for the possibility of a legal person to be the original rightholder (such as is possible in the UK),[9][10] then the duration of protection is in general the same as the copyright term for a personal copyright: i.e., for a literary or artistic work, 70 years from the death of the human author, or in the case of works of joint authorship, 70 years from the death of the last surviving author. If the natural author or authors are not identified, nor become known subsequently, then the copyright term is the same as that for an anonymous or pseudonymous work, i.e. 70 years from publication for a literary or artistic work; or, if the work has not been published in that time, 70 years from creation.[11] (Copyright durations for works created before 1993 may be subject to transitional arrangements).[12]

Further reading

See also

External links

Copyright codes of various countries pertaining to WFH:

United States


  1. ^ U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, clause 8 ("The Congress shall have power . . . To . . . secur[e] . . . to Authors . . . the exclusive Right to their respective Writings . . . .")
  2. ^ 17 U.S.C. § 201(b); Cmty. for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730 (1989)
  3. ^ a b c US Copyright Office, Circular 9: Work-Made-For-Hire Under the 1976 Copyright Act.
  4. ^ Cmty. for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730 (1989)
  5. ^ Daniel A. Tysver, Copyright Ownership (BitLaw).
  6. ^ , retrieved April 28, 2009
  7. ^
  8. ^ Peter B. Hirtle, Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States, 1 January 2007. See link for older works.
  9. ^ Section 11, UK Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act 1988 as amended to 2005. As posted by R. G. C. Jenkins & Co., patent law office. Accessed October 25, 2007.
  10. ^ W. R. Cornish and David Llewelyn, Intellectual Property: Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights, 5th ed. (London : Sweet & Maxwell, 2003) 471-72. ISBN 0421781203. ISBN 9780421781108.
  11. ^ Article 1, Directive harmonizing the term of copyright protection, Directive 93/98/EC.
  12. ^ In the UK see for example Copyright law of the United Kingdom, and links from that page.


Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address