The Full Wiki

bullshit: Wikis


Bullshit (also bullcrap, bullplop, bullbutter, bovine stool) is a common American English expletive which may be shortened to the euphemism bull or the initialism B.S. In British English, "bollocks" is a comparable expletive, although bullshit is now commonly used in British English as well. As with many expletives, it can be used as an interjection or as many other parts of speech, and can carry a wide variety of meanings. Most commonly, it is a noun or interjection that refers to any use of misleading, disingenuous, or false language. While the word is generally used in a deprecating sense, it may imply a measure of respect for language skills, or frivolity, among various other benign usages. In philosophy, Harry Frankfurt, among others, analysed the concept of bullshit as related to but distinct from lying.



"Bull", meaning nonsense, dates from the 17th century[1], while the term "bullshit" has been used as early as 1915 in American slang,[2] and came into popular usage only during World War II. The word "bull" itself may have derived from the Old French boul meaning "fraud, deceit" (Oxford English Dictionary)[2]. The term "horseshit" is a near synonym.

The earliest attestation mentioned by the Concise Oxford English Dictionary is in fact T. S. Eliot, who between 1910 and 1916 wrote an early poem to which he gave the title "The Triumph of Bullshit", written in the form of a ballade. The first stanza goes:

Ladies, on whom my attentions have waited
If you consider my merits are small
Etiolated, alembicated,
Orotund, tasteless, fantastical,
Monotonous, crotchety, constipated,
Impotent galamatias
Affected, possibly imitated,
For Christ's sake stick it up your ass.

The word bullshit does not appear in the text of the poem, though in keeping with the ballade form, the refrain "For Christ's sake stick it up your ass" appears in each following verse and concludes the envoi. Eliot did not publish this poem during his lifetime.[3]

As to earlier etymology the OED cites bull with the meaning "trivial, insincere, untruthful talk or writing, nonsense". It describes this usage as being of unknown origin, but notes the following: "OF boul, boule, bole fraud, deceit, trickery; mod. Icel bull ‘nonsense’; also ME bull BUL ‘falsehood’, and BULL verb, to befool, mock, cheat." [4] Worthy of note is the South African English equivalent "bull dust".

Although as the above makes clear there is no confirmed etymological connection, it might be noted that these older meanings are synonymous with the modern expression "bull" otherwise generally considered, and intentionally used as, a contraction of "bullshit".


Assertions of fact

Bullshit is commonly used to describe statements made by people more concerned with the response of the audience than in truth and accuracy, such as goal-oriented statements made in the field of politics or advertising. On one prominent occasion, the word itself was part of a controversial advertisement. During the 1980 U.S. presidential campaign, the Citizens Party candidate Barry Commoner ran a radio advertisement that began with an actor exclaiming: "Bullshit! Carter, Reagan and Anderson, it's all bullshit!" NBC refused to run the advertisement because of its use of the expletive, but Commoner's campaign successfully appealed to the Federal Communications Commission to allow the advertisement to run unedited.[5]

Distinguished from lying

"Bullshit" does not necessarily have to be a complete fabrication; with only basic knowledge about a topic, bullshit is often used to make the audience believe that one knows far more about the topic by feigning total certainty or making probable predictions. It may also merely be "filler" or nonsense that, by virtue of its style or wording, gives the impression that it actually means something.

In his essay on the subject, William G. Perry called bull[shit] "relevancies, however relevant, without data" and gave a definition of the verb "to bull[shit]" as follows:

To discourse upon the contexts, frames of reference and points of observation which would determine the origin, nature, and meaning of data if one had any. To present evidence of an understanding of form in the hope that the reader may be deceived into supposing a familiarity with content.[6]

The bullshitter generally either knows the statements are likely false, exaggerated, and in other ways misleading or has no interest in their factual accuracy one way or the other. "Talking bullshit" is thus a lesser form of lying, and is likely to elicit a correspondingly weaker emotional response: whereas an obvious liar may be greeted with derision, outrage, or anger, an exponent of bullshit tends to be dismissed with an indifferent sneer.

In philosophy

In his essay On Bullshit (originally written in 1986, and published as a monograph in 2005), philosopher Harry Frankfurt of Princeton University characterizes bullshit as a form of falsehood distinct from lying. The liar, Frankfurt holds, knows and cares about the truth, but deliberately sets out to mislead instead of telling the truth. The "bullshitter", on the other hand, does not care about the truth and is only seeking to impress:[7][8]

It is impossible for someone to lie unless he thinks he knows the truth. Producing bullshit requires no such conviction. A person who lies is thereby responding to the truth, and he is to that extent respectful of it. When an honest man speaks, he says only what he believes to be true; and for the liar, it is correspondingly indispensable that he considers his statements to be false. For the bullshitter, however, all these bets are off: he is neither on the side of the true nor on the side of the false. His eye is not on the facts at all, as the eyes of the honest man and of the liar are, except insofar as they may be pertinent to his interest in getting away with what he says. He does not care whether the things he says describe reality correctly. He just picks them out, or makes them up, to suit his purpose.

Frankfurt connects this analysis of bullshit with Ludwig Wittgenstein's disdain of "non-sense" talk, and with the popular concept of a "bull session" in which speakers may try out unusual views without commitment. He fixes the blame for the prevalence of "bullshit" in modern society upon anti-realism and upon the growing frequency of situations in which people are expected to speak or have opinions without appropriate knowledge of the subject matter.

Gerald Cohen, in "Deeper into Bullshit", contrasted the kind of "bullshit" Frankfurt describes with a different sort: nonsense discourse presented as sense. Cohen points out that this sort of bullshit can be produced either accidentally or deliberately. While some writers do deliberately produce bullshit, a person can also aim at sense and produce nonsense by mistake; or a person deceived by a piece of bullshit can repeat it innocently, without intent to deceive others. [9]

Cohen gives the example of Alan Sokal's "Transgressing the Boundaries" as a piece of deliberate bullshit. Sokal's aim in creating it, however, was to point out that the "postmodernist" editors who accepted his paper for publication could not distinguish nonsense from sense, and thereby by implication that their field was "bullshit".

See also



  1. ^ Concise Oxford English Dictionary
  2. ^ a b
  3. ^ Eliot, T. S. Inventions of the March Hare: Poems 1909-1917 (Harcourt, 1997) ISBN 0-151002-74-6
  4. ^ Mark Liberman (2005-08-17). "Bullshit: invented by T.S. Eliot in 1910?". Language Log. 
  5. ^ Paul Siegel (2007). Communication Law in America. Paul Siegel. p. 507–508. ISBN 0742553876. 
  6. ^ Perry, William G. (1967). Examsmanship and the Liberal Arts. Originally published in Harvard College: A Collection of Essays by Members of the Harvard Faculty.
  7. ^ Jelks
  8. ^ Tauroscatology
  9. ^ Cohen, G. A., "Deeper into Bullshit". Originally appeared in Buss and Overton, eds., Contours of Agency: Themes from the Philosophy of Harry Frankfurt (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2002). Reprinted in Hardcastle and Reich, Bullshit and Philosophy (Chicago: Open Court, 2006), ISBN 0-8126-9611-5.


  • Eliot, T. S. Inventions of the March Hare: Poems 1909-1917 (Harcourt, 1997) ISBN 0-151002-74-6
  • Frankfurt, Harry G. (2005). On Bullshit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-12294-6.  — Harry Frankfurt's detailed analysis of the concept of bullshit.
  • Hardcastle, Gary L.; Reisch, George A., eds (2006). Bullshit and Philosophy. Chicago: Open Court (Carus Publishing). ISBN 0-8126-9611-5. 
  • Holt, Jim, Say Anything, one of his Critic At Large essays from The New Yorker, (August 22, 2005)
  • Penny, Laura (2005). Your Call Is Important To Us: The Truth About Bullshit. Random House. ISBN 1-4000-8103-3.  — Halifax academic Laura Penny's study of the phenomenon of bullshit and its impact on modern society.
  • Weingartner, C. (1975). Public doublespeak: every little movement has a meaning all of its own. College English, Vol. 37, No. 1 (Sep., 1975), pp. 54-61.


Up to date as of January 15, 2010

Definition from Wiktionary, a free dictionary

Wikipedia has an article on:




bull + shit. In use since the 1920s.


bullshit (uncountable)
  1. (vulgar, slang) False or exaggerated statements made to impress the listener rather than deceive.^ "War never solves anything" (Typical statement from girly libs and their ilk) "We are free here today to blog in English rather than German".
    • The Crypt: Biden: Bush's comments were 'bullshit' - 6 February 2010 10:36 UTC [Source type: General]

    Don't pay any attention to him. He talks a lot of bullshit.
  2. (vulgar, slang) A card game in which the object is to bluff about cards laid down and to determine when one's opponents are bluffing.
    Anyone want to play a few hands of bullshit?
  3. (vulgar, slang) An object of frustration and/or disgust, often caused by a perceived deception.
    "This is bullshit!" -- The Monarch
    That's bullshit! I called your office and they said you never came in!
  4. (literally) The faeces of a bull.

See also


  • BS
  • bull
  • bulldada
  • bull puckey
  • bushwah
  • (card game): cheat, I doubt it

Derived terms

  • bullshoot
  • bullshot



to bullshit
Third person singular
Simple past
bullshitted, or sometimes bullshit, or very rarely bullshat
Past participle
[[bullshitted, or sometimes bullshit, or very rarely bullshat]]
Present participle
to bullshit (third-person singular simple present bullshits, present participle bullshitting, simple past and past participle bullshitted, or sometimes bullshit, or very rarely bullshat)
  1. (vulgar, slang) To tell lies, exaggerate; to mislead; to deceive.
    .I think you're bullshitting.^ To Biden; You're so vain, you probably think this speech is about you.
    • The Crypt: Biden: Bush's comments were 'bullshit' - 6 February 2010 10:36 UTC [Source type: General]

    ^ I understand when you're running for office you sometimes think the world revolves around you.
    • The Crypt: Biden: Bush's comments were 'bullshit' - 6 February 2010 10:36 UTC [Source type: General]

    ^ Keep going W. I think you're onto something.
    • The Crypt: Biden: Bush's comments were 'bullshit' - 6 February 2010 10:36 UTC [Source type: General]

    Let’s just call your office and see if you even came in.
    You’re bullshitting me. I called your office and you never even came in.
    .He caught my attention with irrelevant asides that didn’t quite make sense, but sounded very erudite if you didn’t think about it too much.^ I replied: "what makes you think I was referring to you?"
    • The Crypt: Biden: Bush's comments were 'bullshit' - 6 February 2010 10:36 UTC [Source type: General]

    ^ Where do you think my s/n came from?
    • The Crypt: Biden: Bush's comments were 'bullshit' - 6 February 2010 10:36 UTC [Source type: General]

    ^ What makes you think I do?
    • The Crypt: Biden: Bush's comments were 'bullshit' - 6 February 2010 10:36 UTC [Source type: General]

    In other words, I noticed that he was bullshitting.
  2. (vulgar, slang) To have casual conversation with no real point.
    I will probably just go and bullshit with Joe for awhile.


.The translations below need to be checked and inserted above into the appropriate translation tables, removing any numbers.^ Cell ( [ index ] ) Creates a td element, inserts it into the table row at the position given by the argument, and returns the td .
  • HTML5 17 September 2009 7:29 UTC [Source type: Reference]

^ Remove the formatting element from the list of active formatting elements , and insert the new element into the list of active formatting elements at the position of the aforementioned bookmark.
  • HTML5 17 September 2009 7:29 UTC [Source type: Reference]

^ As elements are inserted and removed into the media element , pointer must be updated as follows: .
  • HTML5 17 September 2009 7:29 UTC [Source type: Reference]

Numbers do not necessarily match those in definitions. See instructions at Help:How to check translations.


  1. (vulgar, slang) An expression of disbelief at what one has just heard.


Citable sentences

Up to date as of December 18, 2010

Here are sentences from other pages on Organization, which are similar to those in the above article.

Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address